Logo Logo

    • About Us
      • Home
      • Governance
      • CEE Officers and Board
      • CEE Centres
      • CEE Network
      • CEE Contributors
      • CEE Blogs
      • Opportunities
    • Resources for Authors
      • Guidelines for Authors
      • CEE Critical Appraisal Tool
      • ROSES reporting standards
      • CADIMA Synthesis Tool
      • Register your protocol in PROCEED
      • Stakeholder Engagement
      • Summary of Standards
      • Online Training
    • Events
      • CEE Webinars
      • CEE Training in Evidence Synthesis Methods
      • Meetings
    • Services for Evidence Users
      • CEE Database of Evidence Reviews (CEEDER)
        • About CEEDER
        • About CEESAT
        • CEEDER Methods
        • Support for Authors and Editors
        • CEEDER Volunteers
        • Search the CEEDER Database
      • CEE Evidence Syntheses
      • CEE Evidence Syntheses In Progress
      • Plain Language Summaries of Evidence Syntheses
      • Environmental Evidence Journal
      • Critical Guide to Claims about the Environment
      • Resources for Commissioning an Evidence Synthesis?
    • Working Groups
      • CEE Governance Teams
        • Training Team
        • Guidance and Standards Team
        • Communications Team
        • Meetings Team
        • Journal Team
        • CEEDER Team
        • PROCEED Team
      • Review Teams
      Environmental Evidence > Blog Masonry

    Blog Masonry

    • The Effectiveness of Management Options Used for the Control of Spartina Species (systematic review)

      Posted by AndrewPullin on July 11, 2014

      What is the aim of the review? To systematically collate and synthesise published and unpublished evidence in order to examine the effectiveness of management interventions used to control the abundance or completely eradicate invasive Spartina species; and to analyse, when possible, the effects that potential sources of heterogeneity (e.g. substrate type) have on the results.

    • Does the Use of In-stream Structures and Woody Debris Increase the Abundance of Trout and Salmon? (systematic review)

      Posted by AndrewPullin on July 11, 2014

      What is the aim of the review? To systematically collate and synthesise published and unpublished evidence in order to examine the impact of in-stream structures on the abundance of salmonids and Cottus gobio. The secondary objective was to examine the impact of hydrological and ecological variables on the effectiveness of in-stream structures.

    • Does Sheep-grazing Degrade Unimproved Neutral Grasslands Managed as Pasture in Lowland Britain? (systematic review)

      Posted by AndrewPullin on July 11, 2014

      What is the aim of the review? To systematically collate and synthesise published and unpublished evidence in order to assess the impact of sheep grazing on Cynosurus cristatus-Centaurea nigra (MG5) ‘old meadow’ pasture compared to cattle grazing, horse grazing or no management.

    • Are Current Management Recommendations for Conserving Saproxylic Invertebrates Effective? (systematic review)

      Posted by AndrewPullin on July 11, 2014

      What is the aim of the review? To systematically collate and synthesise published and unpublished evidence in order to address the question: “Are current management recommendations for conserving saproxylic invertebrates effective?” Within this, to investigate whether biotic and abiotic factors, such as those listed below, can be manipulated through site-based management in order to benefit […]

    • 42
    • 43
    • 44
    • 45
    • 46
    • 47
    • 48
    • 49
    • 50
    • 51
    • 52
    • 53
    • 54

    Contact Us

    info@environmentalevidence.org

    Sign up for our Mailing List

    Free Charity Hosting by Kualo

    Stay Connected

    Make a Donation

    CEE is registered with the Charity Commission (1157607). Visit the Charities Aid Foundation to make a donation.

    Copyright © 2021 Collaboration for Environmental Evidence. Developed by Kings Of The Web

    • About Us
    • Resources for Authors
    • Events
    • Services for Evidence Users
    • Working Groups