Logo Logo

    • About Us
      • Home
      • Governance
      • CEE Officers and Board
      • CEE Centres
      • CEE Network
      • CEE Contributors
      • CEE Blogs
      • Opportunities
    • Resources for Authors
      • Guidelines for Authors
      • CEE Critical Appraisal Tool
      • ROSES reporting standards
      • CADIMA Synthesis Tool
      • Register your protocol in PROCEED
      • Stakeholder Engagement
      • Summary of Standards
      • Online Training
    • Events
      • CEE Webinars
      • CEE Training in Evidence Synthesis Methods
      • Meetings
    • Services for Evidence Users
      • CEE Database of Evidence Reviews (CEEDER)
        • About CEEDER
        • About CEESAT
        • CEEDER Methods
        • Support for Authors and Editors
        • CEEDER Volunteers
        • Search the CEEDER Database
      • CEE Evidence Syntheses
      • CEE Evidence Syntheses In Progress
      • Plain Language Summaries of Evidence Syntheses
      • Environmental Evidence Journal
      • Critical Guide to Claims about the Environment
      • Resources for Commissioning an Evidence Synthesis?
    • Working Groups
      • CEE Governance Teams
        • Training Team
        • Guidance and Standards Team
        • Communications Team
        • Meetings Team
        • Journal Team
        • CEEDER Team
        • PROCEED Team
      • Review Teams
      Environmental Evidence > Articles by: AndrewPullin

    AndrewPullin

    All posts by AndrewPullin
    • Does Sheep-grazing Degrade Unimproved Neutral Grasslands Managed as Pasture in Lowland Britain? (systematic review)

      Posted on July 11, 2014

      What is the aim of the review? To systematically collate and synthesise published and unpublished evidence in order to assess the impact of sheep grazing on Cynosurus cristatus-Centaurea nigra (MG5) ‘old meadow’ pasture compared to cattle grazing, horse grazing or no management.

      Continue reading
    • Are Current Management Recommendations for Conserving Saproxylic Invertebrates Effective? (systematic review)

      Posted on July 11, 2014

      What is the aim of the review? To systematically collate and synthesise published and unpublished evidence in order to address the question: “Are current management recommendations for conserving saproxylic invertebrates effective?” Within this, to investigate whether biotic and abiotic factors, such as those listed below, can be manipulated through site-based management in order to benefit […]

      Continue reading
    • Do Hedgerow Corridors Increase the Population Viability of Woodland Species? (systematic review)

      Posted on July 11, 2014

      What is the aim of the review? To systematically collate and synthesise published and unpublished evidence in order to address the following questions: “Do hedgerows increase the population viability of target species occupying otherwise isolated fragments of woodland habitat?” “Do hedgerows increase biodiversity within otherwise isolated fragments of woodland habitat?”

      Continue reading
    • Development as a Conservation Tool: Evaluating Ecological, Economic, Attitudinal, and Behavioural Outcomes (systematic review)

      Posted on July 11, 2014

      What is the aim of the review? To systematically collate and synthesise published and unpublished evidence in order to identify the characteristics of conservation projects that lead to successful ecological, economic, behavioral, and attitudinal outcomes and to determine the quality and quantity of monitoring efforts in the field. To achieve this, five questions were addressed: […]

      Continue reading
    • Effectiveness of Current Methods for the Control of Bracken (Pteridium aquilinum). (systematic review)

      Posted on July 11, 2014

      What is the aim of the review? To systematically collate and synthesise the available evidence in order to examine the effectiveness of bracken control interventions, to identify knowledge-gaps, and to provide an evidence-base to support decision making where bracken control is a problem. The primary objective was to assess evidence on the impact of asulam […]

      Continue reading
    • Do Commonly Used Management Interventions Effectively Control Rhododendron ponticum? (systematic review)

      Posted on July 11, 2014

      What is the aim of the review? To systematically collate and synthesise published and unpublished evidence in order to address the question: “Do commonly used management interventions effectively control Rhododendron ponticum?”

      Continue reading
    • Effectiveness of the Control of Ragwort (Senecio) Species: Can Biological Control by the Use of Natural Enemies Effectively Control Senecio jacobaea (Common Ragwort)? (systematic review)

      Posted on July 11, 2014

      What is the aim of the review? To systematically collate and synthesise published and unpublished evidence in order to evaluate the effectiveness of natural enemies used for the control of common ragwort (Senecio jacobaea), by the use of datasets concerning measures of population density or plant characteristics following biological control experiments.

      Continue reading
    • Do Trapping Interventions Effectively Reduce or Eradicate Populations of the American Mink (Mustela vison)? (systematic review)

      Posted on July 11, 2014

      What is the aim of the review? To systematically collate and synthesise published and unpublished evidence in order to adress the question “Do management interventions effectively reduce or eradicate population numbers of American Mink, Mustela vison?”

      Continue reading
    • Effects of Wind Turbines on Bird Abundance (systematic review)

      Posted on July 11, 2014

      What is the aim of the review? To systematically collate and synthesise published and unpublished evidence in order to examine the impacts of wind turbines on bird abundance. To achieve this, four questions were addressed: Do wind turbines affect bird abundance? Are some bird taxon more vulnerable than others? Does the number or power of […]

      Continue reading
    • Australia

      Posted on July 11, 2014

      The Centre for Evidence Informed Policy and Practice (CEIPP). CEIPP was established in October 2014 as a collaboration of leading researchers and practitioners advancing the development and implementation of evidence based decision making in the Australian environmental sector. The collaboration has representatives from The University of Queensland, The University of Melbourne, Monash University, The University […]

      Continue reading
    • 14
    • 15
    • 16
    • 17
    • 18
    • 19
    • 20
    • 21
    • 22

    Contact Us

    info@environmentalevidence.org

    Sign up for our Mailing List

    Free Charity Hosting by Kualo

    Stay Connected

    Make a Donation

    CEE is registered with the Charity Commission (1157607). Visit the Charities Aid Foundation to make a donation.

    Copyright © 2021 Collaboration for Environmental Evidence. Developed by Kings Of The Web

    • About Us
    • Resources for Authors
    • Events
    • Services for Evidence Users
    • Working Groups