Logo Logo

    • About Us
      • Home
      • Governance
      • CEE Officers and Board
      • CEE Centres
      • CEE Network
      • CEE Contributors
      • CEE Blogs
      • Opportunities
    • Resources for Authors
      • Guidelines for Authors
      • CEE Critical Appraisal Tool
      • ROSES reporting standards
      • CADIMA Synthesis Tool
      • Register your protocol in PROCEED
      • Stakeholder Engagement
      • Summary of Standards
      • Online Training
    • Events
      • CEE Webinars
      • CEE Training in Evidence Synthesis Methods
      • Meetings
    • Services for Evidence Users
      • CEE Database of Evidence Reviews (CEEDER)
        • About CEEDER
        • About CEESAT
        • CEEDER Methods
        • Support for Authors and Editors
        • CEEDER Volunteers
        • Search the CEEDER Database
      • CEE Evidence Syntheses
      • CEE Evidence Syntheses In Progress
      • Plain Language Summaries of Evidence Syntheses
      • Environmental Evidence Journal
      • Critical Guide to Claims about the Environment
      • Resources for Commissioning an Evidence Synthesis?
    • Working Groups
      • CEE Governance Teams
        • Training Team
        • Guidance and Standards Team
        • Communications Team
        • Meetings Team
        • Journal Team
        • CEEDER Team
        • PROCEED Team
      • Review Teams
      Environmental Evidence > Blog Masonry with Sidebar

    Blog Masonry with Sidebar

    • Do Landscape matrix features affect species movement? (systematic review)

      Posted by AndrewPullin on July 12, 2014

      Background Movement across the landscape is predicted to be important to species‟ regional population persistence and response to environmental change. Increased movement may increase the colonisation of newly-suitable patches, as well as recolonisation of patches after extinction events. Many biodiversity policies, such as the European Union Habitats Directive and the England Biodiversity Strategy, include recommendations […]

    • How do thinning and burning treatments in southwestern conifer forests in the United States affect wildlife distribution, abundance, and population performance? (systematic review)

      Posted by AndrewPullin on July 12, 2014

      What is the aim of the review? To examine whether thinning and burning treatments in conifer forests in the southwestern United States affect wildlife distribution, abundance, and population performance.

    • What is the Impact of Public Access on Ground-Nesting Birds? (systematic review)

      Posted by AndrewPullin on July 12, 2014

      What is the aim of the review? To determine the impact of public access on ground-nesting (including cliff- nesting) birds; and to examine the influence of type of access, intensity, duration and season of the impact, the species impacted, spatial scale and follow up period on the impact of public access.

    • The importance of nature for health: is there a specific benefit of contact with green space? (systematic review)

      Posted by AndrewPullin on July 12, 2014

      What is the aim of the review? To examine the effectiveness of direct accessing of natural environments in the promotion of health and well-being compared with other forms of ‘exposure’ to the natural environment or with accessing ‘synthetic’ environments. Secondary questions will be addressed as follows: Do the benefits vary among different types of natural […]

    • 37
    • 38
    • 39
    • 40
    • 41
    • 42
    • 43
    • 44
    • 45
    • 46
    • 47
    • 48
    • 49

    Project Keywords

    Agriculture Aquatic Biodiversity Browsing Buffer strip Carbon sequestration Circular economy Climate change Conservation Ecosystem services Equity Evidence-based policy Evidence map Evidence synthesis Farming Forest conservation Forestry Forests Forest set-aside Global warming Governance Grazing Green infrastructure Habitat management Herbivory Invasive species Invertebrates Land management Livelihoods Livestock Management Marine management Meta-analysis Nature-based solutions Nitrogen Phosphorus Pollution Restoration Riparian buffer Species diversity Species richness Sustainability Systematic map Systematic review Wildlife

    Project Categories

    • Appraisals (6)
    • Blog (2)
    • CEE Centres (14)
    • CEEDER (2)
    • Completed Reviews (107)
    • Guidelines (16)
    • News (43)
    • Reviews In Progress (53)

    Contact Us

    info@environmentalevidence.org

    Sign up for our Mailing List

    Free Charity Hosting by Kualo

    Stay Connected

    Make a Donation

    CEE is registered with the Charity Commission (1157607). Visit the Charities Aid Foundation to make a donation.

    Copyright © 2021 Collaboration for Environmental Evidence. Developed by Kings Of The Web

    • About Us
    • Resources for Authors
    • Events
    • Services for Evidence Users
    • Working Groups