About Us
Home
Governance
CEE Officers and Board
CEE Centres
CEE Network
CEE Contributors
CEE Blogs
Opportunities
Resources for Authors
Guidelines for Authors
CEE Critical Appraisal Tool
ROSES reporting standards
CADIMA Synthesis Tool
Register your protocol in PROCEED
Stakeholder Engagement
Summary of Standards
Online Training
Events
CEE Webinars
CEE Training in Evidence Synthesis Methods
Meetings
Services for Evidence Users
CEE Database of Evidence Reviews (CEEDER)
About CEEDER
About CEESAT
CEEDER Methods
Support for Authors and Editors
CEEDER Volunteers
Search the CEEDER Database
CEE Evidence Syntheses
CEE Evidence Syntheses In Progress
Plain Language Summaries of Evidence Syntheses
Environmental Evidence Journal
Critical Guide to Claims about the Environment
Resources for Commissioning an Evidence Synthesis?
Working Groups
CEE Governance Teams
Training Team
Guidance and Standards Team
Communications Team
Meetings Team
Journal Team
CEEDER Team
PROCEED Team
Review Teams
Environmental Evidence
>
Blog
>
Reviews In Progress
>
Comparing groups versus individuals in decision making: a systematic review protocol
Blog
Comparing groups versus individuals in decision making: a systematic review protocol
Posted on September 6, 2016
Categories:
Reviews In Progress
No comments yet
You might also like
Management of UK priority invasive alien plants: a systematic review protocol
Posted on January 23, 2020
What are the impacts of within-field farmland management practices on the flux of greenhouse gases from arable cropland in temperate regions? A systematic map protocol
Posted on December 9, 2019
How are nature based solutions contributing to priority societal challenges surrounding human well-being in the United Kingdom: a systematic map protocol
Posted on November 25, 2019
Post a comment
Cancel reply
Δ
